“Something about MARY?”
You have just discovered the truth by reading the scriptures on your own that Jesus was not prophesied by Isaiah.
Sadly even the story of Jesus being born of an actual virgin cannot be true if you actually analyze the scriptures in the book of Matthew. You are about to discover for the very first time the true story concerning Mary and the real story about Jesus’ true conception.
This story will irritate most of Christendom and cause a tremendous negative uproar from the masses. I am not showing you this truth to discredit Jesus because I love Jesus.
I am showing you this truth to show just how the pagans have added satanic lies to the bible and expected us to just accept them.
The gospel of Matthew has one purpose: that is to purposely search the Old Testament scriptures and invent new imaginary stories from the prophecies so that Jesus can fulfill them.
Let me show you what I mean…
Sadly even the story of Jesus being born of an actual virgin cannot be true if you actually analyze the scriptures in the book of Matthew. You are about to discover for the very first time the true story concerning Mary and the real story about Jesus’ true conception.
This story will irritate most of Christendom and cause a tremendous negative uproar from the masses. I am not showing you this truth to discredit Jesus because I love Jesus.
I am showing you this truth to show just how the pagans have added satanic lies to the bible and expected us to just accept them.
The gospel of Matthew has one purpose: that is to purposely search the Old Testament scriptures and invent new imaginary stories from the prophecies so that Jesus can fulfill them.
Let me show you what I mean…
The
writer of the gospel of Matthew unknowingly gives us the most damaging
piece of information to his story when he says the following:
· Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise: When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child…MATTHEW 1:18
This scripture is amazing! We learn (2) shocking things from this scripture:
- Mary was actually “married” to Joseph at this time.
- Joseph was about to have sexual relations with his wife on their wedding night and only then was it discovered that Mary was pregnant!
Wow! This is amazing! Now
people will attempt to use word play on the word “espouse.”
In this scripture it does not mean engaged to be married, it means actually married so don’t fall for the hype. By saying the phrase:
In this scripture it does not mean engaged to be married, it means actually married so don’t fall for the hype. By saying the phrase:
Before they came together…
This was telling us that he was about to have sex with Mary. Knowing this we know the only way they could have had sex was if they were married, so again don’t believe the lies of the theologians!
What? You don’t believe me that espoused IN this instance means married in verse 18? Then let’s let the scriptures tell you what espoused means:
· Then Joseph her husband, being a just man, and not willing to make her a public example, was minded to put her away privily. MATTHEW 1:19
Now what did the scripture just say? It says Joseph was Mary’s husband! Come on, say it with me: “Huuuus-band!”
It does not say her Fiancé it says “HUSBAND!” Period! Now you are starting to see the truth!
Do you want one more piece of damaging words of thought? Then we all have to ask the million dollar question!:
“HOW was Mary “FOUND WITH CHILD???”
Now what funny business could have been going on for Joseph to have found or "found out" Mary pregnant hmm? Remember according to the scriptures
The Angel didn’t speak to Joseph about the matter until later on after the discovery! (vs. 20)
The Angel didn’t speak to Joseph about the matter until later on after the discovery! (vs. 20)
There are only three possible answers for the discovery of Mary’s pregnancy.
- This entire story is fabricated from other virgin birth stories passed down from each conqueror. For to the "victor" writes the new historical records in their favor!
- Mary and Joseph may have been promiscuous teenagers who were having sex long before they were married.
- Mary was an unfaithful woman who was pregnant by another man and since she was already engaged to Joseph she decided to pull a fast one and stick him with raising another man’s child. Hence when it was time to consummate their marriage Joseph discovered the gruesome LIE!
Now although scenario number one above, may be the most likely and accurate choice. This will not be acceptable to the Christian community. So, we will focus on the other two scenarios.
I know you think I am speaking heresy and blasphemy. I’m sorry according to the scriptures I am speaking the true context that the Roman Church has never taught the rest of us.
Let me give you a quick History Lesson:
- In both the Muslim and Jewish cultures after a man and woman are officially married. They have an official wedding celebration that may last any where from a day to a week according to the wealth of the family in charge of the celebrations see (John 2).
- At the climatic end of the celebration is the official consummation of the marriage in other words, the bride and groom officially engage in sexual intercourse.
Now here is the key information!
- Right before the husband has sex with his wife usually she goes through a literal vaginal examination.
- This normally is done with the two matriarchs of the two families involved.
So that would have been Joseph’s mother and also Mary’s mother.
- The bride spreads her legs and a finger is inserted into her vaginal cavity to see if her hymen is still in tact.
- If her hymen is fine she is still a virgin but if it is not?
All I can say is: “Trouble, trouble!”
I already know the question you are going to ask:
“Was it the two mothers that find out Mary was pregnant?”
My answer to that question is: Who knows?
You and I both know that there was no way the Catholics would ever allow such evidence like that to remain in the bible.
So all you and I can do is speculate about what may have really happened after Mary’s pregnancy secret may have been uncovered.
I now have a question that I would like for you to answer now.
Tell me:
No one is going to kill my child if I can help it and I’m sure you would feel the same way too!
I know this scenario leads you to many other questions as well.
Frankly, I have no biblical answers for you, all I can do is present the scriptures so you can start to think and analyze the evidence on your own. Let’s get back to our initial story…
Tell me:
What would you do if you were the parents of Mary and you discovered that Mary is pregnant?
Would you actually tell the other people that your daughter is impure?
Would you turn you baby girl over to the people so that she could be stoned to death? I know I wouldn’t!
No one is going to kill my child if I can help it and I’m sure you would feel the same way too!
I know this scenario leads you to many other questions as well.
Frankly, I have no biblical answers for you, all I can do is present the scriptures so you can start to think and analyze the evidence on your own. Let’s get back to our initial story…
Now Mary didn’t tell Joseph she was pregnant and Joseph didn’t find out the truth until he tried to have sex with her on their
wedding night! YIKES!!!!!!!
This is why Matthew 1:18 tells us that Mary was discovered pregnant before Joseph and Mary “came together” or
“HAD SEXUAL INTERCOUSE!”
Oh can you imagine the anguish that Joseph must have felt! I’m sure he really loved Mary but this is just too much to handle. Let’s see what else happens:
· Then Joseph her husband, being a just man, and not willing to make her a public example, was minded to put her away privily. MATTHEW 1:19
I love those words in red don't you?
For the writers always forget to edit out something that exposes them!
Again, not Joseph her fiance, but her husband!
I love how the bible teaches us in spite of those who want to change words to deceive us!
Let's get back to the above verse shall we?
Those of you that read the King James Version probably think this scripture is saying that Joseph wanted to privately hide Mary’s pregnancy from the other residents of their hometown of Nazareth. This is not the case.
Think about it: vs. 19 told us that they were already married.
So the truth is that it is discovered that Mary’s hymen is broken before she has sex with Joseph just like Matthew 1:18 said!
Joseph is just now finding out that Mary is pregnant.
Joseph is now embarrassed and dishonored by this scandal.
Joseph like any other self respecting man didn’t want his business out in public. Joseph decided he wasn’t going to stay married any longer and wanted a “divorce!” I know I would have!
Divorce was legal in these cases as set up by Moses in Deuteronomy:
For the writers always forget to edit out something that exposes them!
Again, not Joseph her fiance, but her husband!
Notice to put her away privately means a divorce!
- If they are not married, then Joseph cannot touch a girl under her father's authority!
I love how the bible teaches us in spite of those who want to change words to deceive us!
Let's get back to the above verse shall we?
Those of you that read the King James Version probably think this scripture is saying that Joseph wanted to privately hide Mary’s pregnancy from the other residents of their hometown of Nazareth. This is not the case.
Think about it: vs. 19 told us that they were already married.
So if a married woman is pregnant there was no reason to put her away right?
So the truth is that it is discovered that Mary’s hymen is broken before she has sex with Joseph just like Matthew 1:18 said!
Joseph is just now finding out that Mary is pregnant.
Joseph is now embarrassed and dishonored by this scandal.
Joseph like any other self respecting man didn’t want his business out in public. Joseph decided he wasn’t going to stay married any longer and wanted a “divorce!” I know I would have!
Divorce was legal in these cases as set up by Moses in Deuteronomy:
· When a man hath taken a wife, and married her, and it come to pass that she find no favour in his eyes, because he hath found some uncleanness in her: then let him write her a bill of divorcement, and give it in her hand, and send her out of his house. Deuteronomy 24:1
As you can see Joseph wasn’t going to fall for the lies of Mary. Joseph wanted a divorce right away! He now knows she was unfaithful to him and her family name.
From our last chapter, we discovered that there were no prophecies that an actual “virgin” was going to give birth at any time in the past or in the future.
So the theory of God impregnating Mary without a human sperm cell no longer holds water with any of us now! So then we have to ask:
So the theory of God impregnating Mary without a human sperm cell no longer holds water with any of us now! So then we have to ask:
“Why would Mary lie about being pregnant and keep it a secret?”
- If a damsel that is a VIRGIN be betrothed unto an husband, and a man find her in the city, and lie with her; Then ye shall bring them both out unto the gate of that city, and ye shall STONE THEM with stones that they die;
- the damsel, because she cried not, being in the city; and the man, because he hath humbled his neighbour's wife: so thou shalt put away evil from among you. Deuteronomy 22:23-24
Be
honest, if you thought you were going to be stoned to death wouldn’t
you keep it a secret too? I know I would have taken it to the grave if I could have. Also check out Deuteronomy 22:14-21 to see how Joseph must have really felt…
I’m sure someone in the Greco-Roman Church came across these discrepancies and reported them too. Since the bible was not allowed in the common man’s possession it probably wasn’t a real concern to the money hungry Catholic leaders at that time.
I’m sure someone in the Greco-Roman Church came across these discrepancies and reported them too. Since the bible was not allowed in the common man’s possession it probably wasn’t a real concern to the money hungry Catholic leaders at that time.
As
time went by and the Roman Empire gained total control of the bible I’m
sure some over zealous scholar then added verses 20-25 to the book of
Matthew chapter 1 to help the story along…
But what may have really happened before the Catholics decided to allegedly edit the bible? Can there be another possible scenario? Let’s try to find out…
So then the new question that we have to ask is:
“Why would Mary lie and keep her pregnancy a secret from Joseph?”
Mary gets pregnant either by Joseph or another suitor.
Mary fearful that her pregnancy will be discovered by her family and/or Joseph needed to leave Nazareth in a hurry!
Mary needs to buy herself some time! Mary hears that her cousin Elizabeth is pregnant and gives an excuse to go and stay with her until she can sort some things out.
Mary fearful that her pregnancy will be discovered by her family and/or Joseph needed to leave Nazareth in a hurry!
Mary needs to buy herself some time! Mary hears that her cousin Elizabeth is pregnant and gives an excuse to go and stay with her until she can sort some things out.
· And Mary arose in those days, and went into the hill country with haste, into a city of Juda; and entered into the house of Zacharias, and saluted Elisabeth. LUKE 1:39:40
Wow! Mary didn’t waste any time getting out of town in a hurry did she? The bible says she left “with haste”.
So what excuse did she give to her family? Better still, what excuse did she give to her fiancé Joseph for her quick departure hmm? What excuse would you give? Think about it…
· And Mary abode with her about three months, and returned to her own house. LUKE 1:56
Wow Mary stays with Elizabeth for three whole Months.
Now that’s a long, long time to be away from her fiancé don’t you think?
What about her family?
Didn’t Mary have a job or family chores or something?
So she can just go and stay away for months at a time huh? Is this the original Paris Hilton?
Mary has run out of options! It’s been three months now and Mary is starting to show signs of her pregnancy.
Mary desperate and having nowhere else to go knows that she only has one option left.
Mary knows her only option is to have a quick marriage to old man Joseph and have sex with her husband as soon as possible before her pregnancy starts to show.
If she can just seduce Joseph and get him excited and hot enough that he will blindly have passionate sex with her without checking then she can blame the child on him.
All Mary has to do is just get Joseph horny enough to make love! This sound like a sappy soap opera episode doesn’t it?
Can’t you almost here the sinister music playing in the back ground with a voice-over announcer saying:
“Can Mary going to get Joseph to MARRY HER?”
“Will Mary’s seduction plan to make Joseph have sex with her SUCCEED?”
“HOW is Mary going to pull this off?”
Will the Apostle Paul have a SEX CHANGE OPERATION???”
Tune in next week for the exciting episode of:
“Bethlehem 90210.”
Yes I am trying to be funny, so calm down.
Even though I am attempting humor here you still have to ask how is Mary actually going to get Joseph excited and aroused enough to get him to sleep with her?
Maybe she has learned a few Hebrew stripper pole tricks or can do the Hebrew "twerk," or maybe she has learned how to do a few seductive dance steps like Salome learned when she sexually aroused her stepfather King Herod before he ordered the death of John the Baptist.
See: (Matthew 14:6-11 & Mark 6:21-29).
Now if Mary can accomplish this task the people will believe that her child belongs to her husband Joseph which in turn spares her life. Great plan Mary! Well almost…
· Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise: When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child…MATTHEW 1:18
Wow! Mary is stone cold busted on her wedding night!
Mary’s diabolical plan back fires and she is found with child before she can get Joseph to have sex with her! Oh the humanity!
Even though Joseph is embarrassed by Mary’s indecency he knew how the rumors would make both of them look.
Joseph wanted to divorce this harlot and move on with his life. However there is a new twist to this controversy! The LAW says Mary should be killed for her sinful acts.
But I have to ask an obvious question:
“WHO ELSE” should be killed with along with Mary?
I mean it takes: “TWO TO TANGO” right?
So what man should also die right along with Mary? Interesting soap opera like events do you agree? Now tell me if you were Joseph:
What would you do???
Would you tell everyone that Mary was pregnant and risk her lying and claiming that you were the baby’s “DADDY?” Or that you raped her? I know I wouldn’t!
Mary lied before to save her own hide so what would make Joseph think that Mary wouldn’t lie again and take him down with her?
There were no D.N.A. laboratories in their day that could prove to us that Joseph was “not” the actual father so it would be her word against his. Joseph has no choice but to stay married to Mary.
You know it and I know it. So now Joseph is forced to give another man’s child His last name. Yeshua Bar Yusef also known as: Jesus son of Joseph…
This is probably why there are no father and son interactions between Joseph and Jesus mentioned anywhere in the bible.
You always hear about Mary Jesus’ mother mentioned but there is nothing mentioned about Joseph Jesus’ father Joseph?
Notice Joseph was not even present at Jesus’ alleged crucifixion! Wow! Why do you think that is?
Who knows? What I do know is that there is really something wrong when a man is not present even at his beloved son’s crucifixion don’t you agree?
Joseph like many other stepfathers may have resented Jesus not being his biological son.
This is just speculation so don’t get upset with me. I’m just pointing out the different scenarios. All I do know is we have proven with all the previous chapters that God did not impregnate Mary and that she kept her pregnancy a secret until it was discovered by someone.
You always hear about Mary Jesus’ mother mentioned but there is nothing mentioned about Joseph Jesus’ father Joseph?
Notice Joseph was not even present at Jesus’ alleged crucifixion! Wow! Why do you think that is?
- Was Joseph still alive?
- Did Joseph die at an early age?
Who knows? What I do know is that there is really something wrong when a man is not present even at his beloved son’s crucifixion don’t you agree?
Joseph like many other stepfathers may have resented Jesus not being his biological son.
This is just speculation so don’t get upset with me. I’m just pointing out the different scenarios. All I do know is we have proven with all the previous chapters that God did not impregnate Mary and that she kept her pregnancy a secret until it was discovered by someone.
If Jesus was not born of a human sperm cell there would be no need for both Matthew and Luke to give us a genealogy of the Davidic bloodline in the first place.
Even the Angel said Jesus was Joseph’s semen born biological child:
MARY'S HUSBAND JOSEPH IS THE FATHER!
- He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David: LUKE 1:32
Luke says Jesus was to reign on the throne of his father’s/bloodline. Do you understand that point people?
Mary was not a descendant from David and there are no scriptures in the Old Testament verses that even hint to such a conclusion in the bible. So don’t believe the apologetics when they try to make excuses for the errors!
Someone changed this story after the real Jews were killed, raped and tossed to the lions! Neither the Disciples of Jesus nor the Jews knew of a prophetic virgin birth. Paul also confirms this fact when he says a human sperm cell is how Jesus was born!
· Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord which was made of the seed/SPERM of David according to the flesh. ROMANS 1:3
Key word phrase here is: “according to” the flesh.”
All humans are conceived according to fleshly sexual intercourse!
As you can see Jesus’ birth was not an exception.
Now I know there will be public outcries to ban or even yet burn this book because of the points that I have discovered and revealed to you in this publication. Is what I’m saying the truth?
No one will ever know the truth for sure because the Vatican will never release the hundreds of gospel texts that were written after Jesus’ died. The one thing that I know is that there was no virgin birth and Mary was not impregnated without a human sperm cell!
Jesus was one of many “sons” of God who was sent to teach us how to repent and serve YHWH the one true God of heaven!
Stop serving Jesus as a god and serve only the God of Jesus as He told us too.
YHWH alone saves us. Selah/Shalom/Salaam…
Brilliant
ReplyDeleteThank you so much for your comments if you want to learn much more come and join our group on facebook called "CHRISTIANS WHO ARE FINALLY AWAKE AND KNOW THE TRUTH" There you can ask any question and will get a real answer and not some preacher's eloquent fluffy answers. If we can't prove what we say with scripture then we are liars. Up for the challenge? Then come join us and see for yourself what the bible really says in "CONTEXT". See you there...
DeleteEcclesiasticus 23:22- 26 Thus shall it go also with the wife, that leaueth her husband, and bringeth in an heire by another: For first she hath disobeyed the Law of the most High: and secondly, she hath trespassed against her owne husband, and thirdly, she hath played the whore in adultery, and brought children by another man. She shall be brought out into the congregation, and inquisition shall be made of her children.Her children shall not take root, and her branches shall bring forth no fruit.
ReplyDeleteHmmm. Why would the angel endeavor to encourage Mary (who has given the angel's announcement some rational thought) to believe in the impossible (Luke 1:36, 37) if something truly miraculous wasn't about to come to pass? What's so miraculous about a human male causing a woman to conceive in her womb??? And while we are on the subject of the genealogies of Matthew and Luke, here's another question for your consideration: How could the man named "Shealtiel" listed in both genealogies (Matthew 1:12, Luke 3:27) have two fathers??? In Matthew, he is King Jeconiah (I Chronicles 3:17), and in Luke 3:27, he is a man called "Neri".
ReplyDeleteGood morning Patrick,, thanks for your comments. Now here is the answer to your above question. Simple answer, is the Angel wouldn't. Let me explain:
DeletePatrick, God has been forgiving our sins since he created us. Now to say that God for some reason now wants to change his OWN rules makes no sense? 2nd Chronicles tells us all we ever had to do to be forgiven for sins and cleansed was simple to humble ourselves and pray(atone) for our sins then we would hear from heaven and God himself said that he would FORGIVE, FORGIVE, FORGIVE all of our sins and heal our lands? So Patrick for a Greek written New Testament to say that God's words in 2nd Chronicles is now a lie means someone is trying to deceive us right?
Lastly, Patrick don't forget, since you used Luke as a reference for your question, remember Luke was NOT NOT NOT A DISCIPLE! He never heard Jesus speak, or walked with him. Luke was an UNCLEAN GREEK and even Luke in chapter one of his writings admits that he heard these things from someone else. meaning God didn't tell him to write and neither did any original Disciple. These truths should help your walk,
Thank you so much for your comments if you want to learn much more come and join our group on facebook called "CHRISTIANS WHO ARE FINALLY AWAKE AND KNOW THE TRUTH" There you can ask any question and will get a real answer and not some preacher's eloquent fluffy answers. If we can't prove what we say with scripture then we are liars. Up for the challenge? Then come join us and see for yourself what the bible really says in "CONTEXT". See you there...
By that time Jesus made it so whether Jew or Greek if you believed on the name of the Messiah you were saved.
DeleteI know you joked about the heresy part, but bro, you may actually be talking heresy, chill out man, cause if you are, then well...god has never dealt with that lightly, that is my only advice on this matter, I've heard most of your main doubts or discontent with the biblical teachings and I have fairly answered all of them for myself when proof reading, but I am of a more seasoned variety than many are today because of live decisions and walks and access/proper teaching of the scriptures and how to read them through wisdom of the Holy Spirit, but for younger believers you will lead them astray with this, if you cannot definitively disprove it, you shouldn't touch it, if god has not told you this, then you should not lean onto your own understanding regarding these matters in my opinion, this is just my opinion though, we all have to answer for all we do when it is our time, I am just pleading with you to take a second glance with the eyes of the Holy Spirit and not the eyes of a well learned man who regards intelligence maybe a bit too high as many who have gripes with scriptures often do, it is the same kind of men who planned jesus death don't forget, and the ones who followed them said they loved jesus in the open, but in secret and in their hearts, sought to do nothing but bring down god and anything that wasn't comfortable with their level of understanding to maintain power, you speak of the catholics and many heretical early christians, but do not forget, we have all fallen short, all it takes is a second for you to become the very thing you hate.
https://zondervanacademic.com/blog/why-are-jesus-genealogies-in-matthew-and-luke-different/
ReplyDeleteBro, you need to pray and stop getting caught up in the other extreme of doctrines out here, you're straddling the fence on the opposite side of the heretical peeps it seems, and are talking like pharisees.
Read the link man there are legitimite ways to explain this, pray and seek the Lord if you still doubt.