My
Brothers and Sisters, I have never read anything on the subject that I am about
to reveal to you. Most of us will choose
to disregard this information as speculative nonsense.
However there will be some
of you, who after reading and researching the verses in this document, will
receive a spiritual illumination and fire that no one will ever be able to extinguish
again. For approximately two thousand
years the New Testament writers have led us to believe that JUDAS
ISCARIOT was the betrayer of Jesus.
We accepted that answer because
there didn’t seemed to be any valid reason to question that statement until
now! If you have read my book from the beginning I’m sure you are questioning
many things that you have been told by your ministers concerning the true
gospel. After careful study of the biblical scriptures in context, I have
reason to believe that Judas never betrayed Jesus at all.
I believe Judas was used
as the scapegoat by the Roman Catholic Church to cover up the real betrayer of
Jesus and to justify the office of the Papacy.
So if Judas didn’t betray Jesus who could it be? The betrayer of Jesus will
probably shock you! I believe the betrayer of Jesus was one of his best
friends. I believe the true betrayer of Jesus was none other than Simon Peter! Catholics
proclaim that Peter was the First POPE ordained by Jesus himself.
My Brothers and Sisters as we shall see, this
was a satanic lie allegedly perpetuated by Rome. Their purpose was to deny the truth so
that they alone could interpret the Bible, fill the church coffers and lead the
people on a direct road to HELL.
So
let’s start our step by step investigation to see if the bible reveals who the
betrayer of Jesus really was…
Now
we all know that Peter was one of Jesus’ original student Disciples in the
ministry. Peter and Jesus’ relationship wasn’t just a ministerial
student/teacher type of relationship. Jesus and Peter eventually became good
friends and were as close as brothers. Wherever Jesus went Peter was usually
somewhere close by His side. Now when did Peter start following Jesus in the
ministry and how did this friendship initially start?
THE MEETING:
The
four gospels give very conflicting stories of how Jesus and Peter first met
each other and also conflicting stories on how Jesus met some of the other
Disciples as well.
Matthew 4:18, Mark
1:16 & Luke 5:2 tell us that Jesus was the one who went down to the Sea of
Galilee looking for disciples to follow Him.
However John 1:35-42 contradicts those stories and says that the Disciples
were the ones who went looking for Jesus and went and stayed at Jesus’ house
with Him for the whole day.
In the first three gospels the Disciples believed
Jesus because of the miracles Jesus performed on the boats.
However the book of
John says that the Disciples sought Jesus because of the words of their
original teacher, John the Baptist.
After John the Baptist is alleged to have
proclaimed Jesus as the Son of God, Andrew and Peter supposedly became
followers of Jesus’ ministry. Conflicting stories to say the least…
Yes,
the New Testament gospels do tell us that Jesus was the Messiah, but when was
this information first discovered and by who? When did these Disciples
determine that Jesus was the Messiah?
·
One
of the two which heard John speak, and followed him, was Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother. He findeth his own brother Simon,
and saith unto him, we have found the Messiah,
which is, being interpreted the Christ. JOHN
1:41
So the
book of John says that Andrew and Peter learned that Jesus was the Messiah from
their original mentor, John the Baptist. This statement once again leads to
more conflicting statements.
Did John the Baptist proclaim Jesus was
the Messiah? Let’s read the book of John:
- “The next day “JOHN” seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, “BEHOLD the Lamb of God which “TAKETH AWAY the “SIN” of the WORLD THIS IS “HE” whom “I SAID”, after me cometh a man which is preferred before me, for he was before me.” JOHN 1: 29, 30
So
after reading the above verse it does seem like John the Baptist is verifying
that Jesus is the Messiah.
However, the book of Luke contradicts the above scriptures
of John:
- “And the disciples of “JOHN” shewed him of all these things. And “JOHN” calling unto him two of his disciples sent them to Jesus, saying, art thou “HE” that should come? Or “LOOK FOR ANOTHER?” When the men were come unto him, they said, John Baptist hath sent us unto thee, saying, Art thou he that should come? Or look we for another?” LUKE 7:18-20
Wow!
What a major contradiction! What have we just learned from these two verses?
- John the Baptist had never personally met Jesus before unless Jesus was one of the hundreds of people who came to him to be baptized.
- Did you notice that John the Baptist’s knowledge of Jesus came from rumors only after he went to jail? (See Luke 7:17, 18)
- John the Baptist never told Peter and Andrew that Jesus was the prophesied Messiah!
It
seems to me that someone is purposely trying to invent scenarios for Jesus to fulfill.
As you can see from Luke’s
gospel, John the Baptists’ disciples did
not follow Jesus based on his recommendation.
If these disciples thought
Jesus was the Messiah it would have been their own decision. I believe Andrew
or Peter or possibly both are the culprits who initially started the rumors
that Jesus was the Messiah.
The legend of Jesus was starting to grow and Jesus’
notoriety was beginning to reach celebrity status.
Wherever Jesus traveled
massive crowds seemed to overflow. Being a simple Nazarene prophet, Jesus is
confused by the sudden attention He is receiving. When Jesus arrives at
Caesarea Philippi, once again there is another massive crowd waiting for His
arrival. Now Jesus knows something peculiar is going on. So Jesus decides to
question His Disciples and find out what is really going on:
·
When
Jesus came into the coasts of
Caesarea Philippi, he asked
his disciples, saying, whom do men
say that I the Son of Man am?" MATTHEW
16:13
Seeing the anticipation in
the eyes of the people at Caesarea, Jesus
wanted to know who all the people were, and why so many people are in
attendance. Jesus probably could hear the cheers and adoration from the people.
Jesus knows that kings and other important dignitaries are the ones who would
normally receive this sort of treatment. Jesus realizes that these people are
literally praising Him instead of God. So Jesus turns to His Disciples and asks
them:
"Who do these people
think I, the SON of a MAN really am?”
Did
you notice how Jesus made a clear and humble distinction to the Disciples that
He was nothing more than a mere son of a “MAN?”
Think about it for a moment and
let it sink in. Now let’s get back to
our subject.
So
Jesus asks the Disciples who the people think He is:
·
And
they said, some say that thou art John the Baptist: some, Elias; and others,
Jeremiah, or one of the prophets. MATTHEW 16:14
The
Disciples inform Jesus that some of the people think that He may be the second
coming of John the Baptist or Elijah or even Jeremiah.
Now
these are three of the most renowned and respected of the Hebrew prophets.
For
Jesus to be placed on such a high regard as these three great men is really an
honor.
However Jesus wants to know where these people could have possibly heard
such ridiculous nonsense as this.
After careful consideration there can only be
one possible answer to why the people might believe something like this. Jesus
believes one of His own Disciples may have told the people that He is the
Messiah. So Jesus asks them a very crucial question!
·
He
saith unto them, But WHOM say YE (Disciples) that I AM? MATTHEW 16:15
Well there it is! Jesus asks the question
directly to the Disciples. Jesus needs to know if they are responsible for all of the crowd’s speculation.
One voice steps
forward to give the crucial answer that will be heard and professed around the
Christian world for generations to come!
·
And
Simon Peter answered and
said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living
God. MATTHEW 16:16
So
as you can see, Peter was the one who stepped up and let Jesus know that He is
the one responsible for the frenzy of the crowds.
Peter was the one who told the people that Jesus was more
than just the son of a man.
Peter goes much farther and tells the people that
Jesus was both the literal Son of God and that He is also the long awaited
Messiah! Amazing, isn’t it?
So
what do you think Jesus’ response would have been to
Peter’s answer?
Well that depends on which gospel you choose to believe.
Remember
earlier I told you about the conspiracy of the Roman Catholic Church. I
mentioned how the church suppressed the truth about the character of Peter to
justify the office of the Pope.
Peter was said to have been the first official
beholder of the office of the Pope, a position that has been coveted by the
Catholic churches ever since.
I believe Matthew 16:17-18 were later added by
the church to make us believe that Jesus was handing the leadership control of
His church over to Peter after His death.
Now the first gospel written was the
book of Mark.
In the book of Mark the lie that Peter is the so-called Rock of
the church is not added to the scriptures at all!
Furthermore, if you look back
and read Matthew 16:17-18, those two verses seem very out of place
when you see the final words of Jesus in verse 20 where He tells Peter and the
Disciples not to tell anyone that he is the Messiah.
So
that both gospels will be totally identical, let’s eliminate verses 17 and 18
added by the Roman Catholic in Matthew:
·
He
saith unto them, But WHOM say YE that I AM? MATTHEW 16:15
Peter’s
bold response to Jesus was:
·
And
Simon Peter answered and
said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God. MATTHEW
16:16
So
again we see that Peter has no shame at all. Peter tells Jesus and the other
Disciples that He thinks that Jesus may be the long awaited prophesied Messiah
of the Jews.
Now my Brothers and Sisters, after reading this is context, you
have to conclude the following:
Up to the point when Jesus asked the question in Matthew
16:15, Jesus never taught the
Disciples that He was the prophesied Messiah!
If
Jesus would have taught the Disciples that He was the messiah then His question
to them would be totally pointless!
Jesus never told Peter or any Disciple that
He was the messiah. This is why Jesus was so confused about all of the
attention from the crowds.
Now
I would have loved to see the face of the other Disciples after Peter admitted
that he was responsible for spreading the rumors that Jesus was the messiah.
So
what do you think Jesus’ real response was once He found out that
Peter was the one responsible for spreading the rumors that He was the Messiah?
Let’s see:
·
Then
CHARGED he (Jesus) His DISCIPLES that they should tell NO MAN that HE was Jesus the MESSIAH. MATTHEW 16:20
Wow!
The truth finally comes forth! After Peter makes His asinine proclamation,
Jesus turns to Peter and the rest of the Disciples and rebukes them for
spreading such blasphemous lies
to the people!
The bible says that Jesus gave His Disciples a direct order that
they were never, to tell any man, woman or child the LIE that He was the prophesied
Messiah ever again! Wow! This is incredible!
The gospel of Mark also confirms
this point as well!
·
…and
PETER answereth and saith
unto him, Thou art the Christ. And HE (JESUS) CHARGED them that they should tell NO MAN of Him. MARK 8:29, 30
Despite
what you have learned in your churches the bible seems to tell a different
story than what you have heard before!
As you can see, Jesus is not the Messiah
as we have been told. Now let me repeat that again! Straight from Jesus’ own
mouth,
He admits that He was not the Messiah!!!
Wow! Now don’t argue with me! I
am not making this up!
You have just read two verses straight from the mouth of
Jesus that I’m sure the Greco-Roman Churches wished they would have edited out of the bible now!
Both
Matthew and Mark’s gospels tell us that not only does Jesus deny being the awaited Messiah, but
He also gave His Disciples a direct
order or commandment for
them to never repeat this nonsense
ever again! Yes you heard the scripture correctly!
Jesus ordered Peter and any
of the other Disciples to never tell the people that He is a Messiah.
Now you
know the truth! However, when you go back to your churches and attempt to teach
this truth, the people are going to call you unsaved or even a devil. Your
minister or pastors will try to pacify you with ridiculous rhetoric such as:
“Jesus was not prohibiting the Disciples
from teaching the people that He was the Messiah forever. Jesus wanted to temporarily
silence the Disciples’ rumors until after He had finished His ministry on
earth.” Ridiculous Church Dogma 101
I’m
sure that you will agree with me that this has to be one of the silliest
answers you have ever heard! I’m sorry, Jesus’ words are very clear. He is not the messiah; so says Jesus!
Amen!
So
why would Peter make up something like this? Why would Peter attempt to stir up
the emotion of the people by telling them that Jesus was the Messiah?
A quick history lesson:
Remember
the Jews were being oppressed by the Roman Empire.
Everyone assumed that John the Baptist was the long awaited Messiah because of
the fire of his anointed words. (See
John 1:19-25).
Peter
also thought that his original teacher, John the Baptist, was the Messiah as
well.
All of those plans went up in smoke after John was imprisoned and
beheaded!
Someone had to take John the Baptist’s place as a messianic champion
to rally the people against Rome.
After Jesus arrives on the scene preaching the same message as John, Peter
decided that Jesus could be the one that could assemble the people to revolt
against the Roman Empire as the Jewish
conquering Messiah. Now you know the historical background.
So let’s return to
Peter:
As
you can see Peter had a vested interest in following Jesus’ ministry.
To Peter,
Jesus has the potential to be an untapped goldmine both spiritually and
financially to the right person who could mold Jesus into the proper political
candidate.
Sounds good, right? Peter has a plan but unfortunately for Peter
Jesus had a different agenda.
·
From
that time forth began Jesus to show unto his Disciples, how that he must go
unto Jerusalem,
and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be
killed, and be raised again the third day. MATTHEW
16:21
Can
you imagine the look on Peter’s face
when Jesus informs the Disciples of His own plans in Jerusalem?
This knowledge lights a fire of rage in Peter’s heart!
Jesus knew that
by going to Jerusalem He may face certain death just like the other prophets
who also attempted to teach the people how to repent and turn back to their
heavenly Father YHWH.
Jesus’ plan was to do God’s will and teach the people to
humbly turn back to God.
This goes against Peter’s plans and this starts the
beginning of Peter’s hatred for Jesus and the ministry!
Peter feels that he can
change Jesus’ mind. Peter applies the pressure screws to Jesus:
·
Then
Peter took him (Jesus) and
began to rebuke him, saying be it far from thee, Lord: this shall be unto thee. MATTHEW 16:22
Can
you believe the nerve of Peter? Peter thinks he has the right to scold and
rebuke Jesus. Huh?
Peter knows that Jesus is his future meal ticket, so Peter
angrily decides he will rebuke Jesus for speaking such foolishness!
Because
Peter has so much anger and rage inside of him Jesus can now see the true character
and hidden agendas of Peter now!
Jesus realizes that Peter had another motive
for following Him.
After Peter’s true nature is exposed, Jesus stops Peter’s rant
and counter-attacks Peter with the truth!
Jesus lets us know that Peter’s true motive was PERSONAL GAIN:
·
But
He turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, SATAN: thou (Peter) art an OFFENCE unto me: for thou (Peter) savourest not the things that be of GOD, but those
that be of MEN. MATTHEW 16:23
Jesus
became so angry with Peter’s messiah rumors and greed that He decided to scold
Peter in front of all of the other Disciples! Jesus calls Peter by his true
name, Satan which means: the Adversary.
Jesus realized from Peter’s actions that Peter was an OFFENSIVE
to Him and to GOD!
Does Peter still sound like the “ROCK” that Jesus
was to build His Church upon?
Heck no!
Since Christians believe in “demon
possession” we have to also ask:
“Was Jesus rebuking
the Devil that entered Peter?”
No, Jesus was not speaking to another demon entity.
Jesus was speaking
directly to Peter and calling him Satan because Peter’s heart was not pure.
Peter’s mind and heart were focused only on his own financial desires.
Jesus told
Peter that he was not following Him because he had a desire to be a soul winner
for God’s kingdom. Jesus says that Peter desires are selfish in nature.
Peter
wanted the materialistic goods
that men have. So what material things of men do you think Peter desired? Yes
you guessed it, Peter wanted:
POWER, NOTORIETY, , RESPECT
and large amounts of MONEY!
These are the things that Peter desired most in his heart and Jesus knew it.
Now
after rebuking Peter, Jesus turns and warns the other Disciples and followers
NOT to become like Peter.
Jesus teaches them that true followers of God must deny
themselves, learn the truth and follow His example.
Jesus
says in Mathew 16:25 that whosoever will
save his OWN life shall lose it and who ever will lose his
life shall find eternal life!
Now
Jesus again preaches a major topic that shows us that Peter was not a true
Disciple.
01.) Did Peter follow the last part of the teaching of Jesus and DENY
himself? NO!
02.) Did Peter SAVE his own Life? YES HE
DID!
Before we continue let’s recap what we have learned so far:
- Jesus denies being the Messiah and gives a strict “COMMANDMENT” to the Disciples to NEVER tell anyone that lie again. MATTHEW 16:16 & MARK 8:29, 30
- Jesus then gives a premonition of Peter’s betrayal: MATTHEW 16:21
- Jesus rebukes Peter in front of everyone and says Peter is being a hindrance to His ministry of Yahweh. MATTHEW 16:23
- Jesus calls Peter SATAN which means adversary. Or OPPOSER! MATTHEW 16:23
- Jesus boldly says Peter is following Him for the wrong reasons and that He is not really seeking Yahweh’s kingdom, only power and notoriety. MATTHEW 16:23
- Jesus tells all of the Disciples and followers that if they are to follow His ministry they must not be selfish and deny themselves unlike Peter. MATTHEW 16:24
What
does an adversary do? He opposes the actions of others.
If you
are doing good things the adversary wants you to do the bad ones.
If you are
attempting to free others from spiritual bondage as Jesus was, then Peter, who
Jesus calls Satan, would have to oppose you to the highest regard and
limit your ministry.
Jesus
continues using Peter as his example of what not to do in the ministry. I’m
sure at this point Peter’s blood is boiling!
Peter is outraged at Jesus!
Can you imagine what is on Peter’s mind now?
“After all that I have done for Jesus, He has the nerve to embarrass me in front of the other Disciples and call me a devil?” I made you Jesus and I can BREAK you too!
Peter
is probably thinking that he is the one responsible for Jesus’ popularity.
Not
only did Jesus foil Peter’s plan for world domination but Jesus also
embarrasses Peter in front of all of the other Disciples as well! Lastly after
Jesus rebukes Peter for following Him for money
and power, Jesus turns to the other
Disciples and says the following:
·
For what shall it profit a man, if he
shall gain the whole world,
and lose his own soul? 37. Or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul. MATTHEW 16:26
& MARK 8:36-37
Notice
how Jesus, after rebuking Peter, continues teaching the people the truth about
the betrayer without having to
even say Peter’s name. Jesus asks:
“What will a man give in exchange for His
soul?”
Maybe He should ask
Peter what he will ACCEPT in
exchange for his soul as well.
The very next verse shows more light on whom
Jesus is clearly speaking about:
·
WHOSOEVER therefore shall be “ASHAMED”
of me and of “MY WORDS” in this adulterous and sinful generation;
of “HIM” shall the Son of man be ashamed, when he cometh in the
glory of his Father with the holy angels. MARK
8:38
Does
this verse fit Peter perfectly? Yes it does!
Jesus gave the other Disciples a "prophetic" warning in advance about
the person who will be ashamed of Him and His Ministry of Yahweh.
Jesus speaks
openly about His betrayer and also directly to His betrayer.
Apparently Peter does not understand the
message and decides to try his Grandstanding tactics once
again.
Jesus quickly shuts Peter’s
mouth harshly!
·
PETER answered and said unto him, though
all men shall be offended because of
thee, yet will I never be offended. MATTHEW
26:33
Wow! How noble of Peter to be
willing to stand up and acknowledge that He stands with Jesus with pride before
all men. Yeah right. Peter is so gallant isn’t he?
He makes a promise to Jesus and says He
will never be embarrassed by Jesus or his ministry.
Jesus knows a con man when He hears one and He
knows Peter is full of crap! So again Jesus rebukes Peter/Satan and says he is
a liar!
·
Jesus
said unto him, Verily I say
unto thee, (Peter) that this night, before the cock crows, thou shalt DENY ME THRICE. MATTHEW 26:34
Jesus
tells Peter that He will be the FIRST to deny him.
Jesus has just again embarrassed
Peter in front of the rest of the Disciples.
Peter tells Jesus in a stronger
voice that he is willing to die for Jesus and will never deny Him!
Jesus knew
better and says that He will not have to wait long for Peter's betrayal because
Peter was going to deny Jesus that VERY
NIGHT!
Now
Luke tells the same exact story as Matthew but elaborates further about the Character
of Peter. Let’s read the scriptures that lead up to Peter denying Jesus three
times:
·
And
the Lord said, Simon, Simon,
behold, SATAN hath desired to
have HAVE YOU, that he may sift
you as wheat:
But I have prayed
for thee, that thy (FAITH) FAIL NOT: and when THOU art CONVERTED, strengthen thy brethren. LUKE 22:31, 32
Jesus
again gives a "prophetic" warning about the character of Peter. Jesus knew the heart of Peter and
points this out to him.
Remember earlier Jesus told Peter that he didn’t desire
the kingdom of God. Jesus said that Peter desired the riches
and power
of men.
Jesus makes it clear to Peter that Satan also knows Peter's true heart and wants to
use Peter to do his evil work. Jesus uses the term:
“Sift
you as wheat.”
Jesus
says:
“PETER,
I have prayed for you that your faith in God does not fail.”
“When you are finally converted strengthen your brethren.”
There
is an old saying that goes:
“Keep your friends close but keep your Enemies even CLOSER!”
Jesus
didn’t want to give up on His friend Peter even though He knew the evil in
Peter’s heart.
Jesus, anticipating that God will eventually hear His prayers,
says to Peter:
“When
you finally submit yourself to the will of Yahweh and are finally CONVERTED,
strengthen your brethren.”
As
you see by Jesus’ own statement, Peter was not
a Converted
follower of His.
Peter followed Jesus for the notoriety that
came with being associated with Jesus.
Mark
9:33, 34, tells us that some of the Disciples started arguing about
which of them is the GREATEST
of the Disciples.
When
Jesus wants to know what all the commotion is about they are quiet.
Now as
outspoken as Peter has been throughout the scriptures and since Jesus told us
that Peter desires vain notoriety and the vain things of man, we know that he is involved
in the debate.
Remember earlier Jesus told us that Peter needed to be CONVERTED:
·
And
said, Verily I say unto you, except ye be CONVERTED,
and become as little children, ye
shall not enter into the
kingdom of heaven. MATTHEW 18:3
·
And
he sat down, and called the twelve, and saith unto them, if any man desire to be FIRST, the same shall be last
of all, and servant of all. MARK 9:35
Jesus
makes it clear to the arguing Disciples that except you be CONVERTED, and
show the humility as a child, you will never enter into the Kingdom of Heaven.
It sounds like someone needs a spiritual
conversion huh? I wonder which Disciple that could be hmmm?
Jesus
also tells the Disciples that if any one of them has a desire for Power
and Notoriety
then they would be the last of all to enter the kingdom of heaven.
Now we all know which Disciple desired power and notoriety don’t we! Jesus
told us that power and notoriety were the most important things that Peter
craved most of all!
Peter has had enough! Peter sets satanic
events in motion that will impact the world for more than two thousand years!
The LIE that JUDAS is the betrayer of Jesus!
Click on the next blog to continue this amazing revelation!
SHALOM/SALAAM/SELAH
You have stumbled upon some crucial information but you have jumped from such a valid starting point to a posture that seems to deny that Jesus was sent by God to deliver God's own teachings from the lips of Jesus. Quite a large error. The Messiah was historically simply an annointed prophet. Jesus was indeed rebuking Peter but this is also cleared up in Matt 16 if you truly studied it more deeply. " I say, THAT ( son of GOD) ..THOU art ALSO!
ReplyDeleteThis was the reason for Jesus' correction of Peter's false assumption....prompting a singlular... son of God doctrine. This is only relevant if you include all of created humanity as one whole creation outside of the separation fostered by the ego natures of men. This is completely missed by the masses of CHristians...TODAY!
You also missed another crucial point...BARJONA was not the designation of Simon's father, as Jona. Jona is a female Greek name. SIMON ( Shimon) is a Hebrew word name. Bar is an ARAMAIC word. JONA is a Greek "feminine" name.
Taken together as hyphenated words as they appear in SOME scripture indicates a gross error ....Perhaps the biggest cover up!
However in the Hebrew, this single word..barjona...means commonly ...OUTLAW or BANDIT! Jesus, prior to calling Simon a devil who regards the thoughts of men over the things of GOD, refers to Simon as the "outlaw" disciple. He clearly says SIMON REMAINS at odds with the LAWS of Heaven. Much of scripture has been MAN- handled..as you see in inserted interpretations..
"(meaning by this, ..the CHRIST)" Jn 1:41.
and in John, the prophecy of Jesus on Simon...
(meaning by this the kind of Death Peter would die)"
These are not actual scripture but..INSERTIONS which are intended to support church leading doctrines. If this was plainly done done by obvious insertions..supposedly offered as the words of the Gospel's author, then it is certain in other places that coverups and possible insertions have been made by a chruch that forbade the reading of scriptures by laity for 1500 years or the translation into other readable languages, under the penalty of excommunication or in some cases the death penalty ordered by the Vatican.
Excellent reply Anonymous. let me answer each point in order:
ReplyDelete1.You said: "You have stumbled upon some crucial information but you have jumped from such a valid starting point to a posture that seems to deny that Jesus was sent by God to deliver God's own teachings from the lips of Jesus. ."
(ANSWER): There is nothing that remotely suggests that Jesus was not sent by God to deliver God's message. I 100% believe that. For he was like all Prophets/messengers/sons of God. He was sent to return the people back to God. Yes I agree with you the Messiah was nothing more than a prophet. We agree on this point. I hope I cleared that for you.
2.
Anonymous here is the answer to your second question:
ReplyDelete#02. You said: Jesus was indeed rebuking Peter but this is also cleared up in Matt 16 if you truly studied it more deeply. " I say, THAT ( son of GOD) ..THOU art ALSO! This was the reason for Jesus' correction of Peter's false assumption....prompting a singlular... son of God doctrine. This is only relevant if you include all of created humanity as one whole creation outside of the separation fostered by the ego natures of men. This is completely missed by the masses of CHristians...TODAY!
(ANSWER): YOUR " I say, THAT ( son of GOD) ..THOU art ALSO! I could not find?? I think you combined several verses to make your point. Look at my section on the 11 LIES of Matthew and you will see that the original or first story is told in Mark where the lie of Jesus claiming Peter was right is not there and added later by some other false scribe..
Anonymous you said: "You also missed another crucial point...BARJONA was not the designation of Simon's father, as Jona. Jona is a female Greek name. SIMON ( Shimon) is a Hebrew word name. Bar is an ARAMAIC word. JONA is a Greek "feminine" name.
ReplyDeleteTaken together as hyphenated words as they appear in SOME scripture indicates a gross error ....Perhaps the biggest cover up!"
(ANSWER): I don't know where you are getting your information.. Now I'm not saying you are wrong. Because I'm always willing to see another person's point of view. However, I would love to know why you are doing an interchanging of words to make your point. What was Jesus' point by saying BAR JONA? Was he speaking in tongues? from Aramaic to Greek? LOL!! HECK NO.. So again, let's say the translators got it wrong as you surmise? What then is Jesus' point for using the terminology at all? aha! see, in your effort to decipher languages, you are missing the overall point of the conversation. and I added a link for you to see our points of view on the Bar Jona usage,, if you have one, please provided for all my readers. Again not saying you are wrong. But you put it out there that we Christians believe the mis-interpretation.. fair enough. let's see the proof.
http://www.abarim-publications.com/Meaning/Barjona.html#.U_mJE6O7OuI
lastly, my friend, THE GREEK LANGUAGE is not HEBREW or ARAMAIC and VICE VERSA! Remember the added lie OF ISAIAH 7:14 where the liars claimed some IMAGINARY "virgin" was going to give birth? based on the Greek's word Parthenos-virgin vs. Isaiah's Hebrew word ALMA/young woman/young maiden ACTUAL verbiage? So, to argue on useless points takes away from the fact that PETER was a LIAR and followed PAUL into becoming the greatest adversary/Satan of God to which Christianity has flourished to this very day as a doctrine of lies from the BEAST/ROME!
ReplyDeleteTHANKS for posting.. You comments are accepted in love and true discussion... be blessed..